From df05d6c374e4ed2f7024d98d3c0e2928ef337205 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: 1technophile <florian.robert@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 15:07:17 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] correct sending with RFM69

#376
---
 ZgatewayRFM69.ino | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ZgatewayRFM69.ino b/ZgatewayRFM69.ino
index e1efb8e..2a7254a 100644
--- a/ZgatewayRFM69.ino
+++ b/ZgatewayRFM69.ino
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ boolean RFM69toMQTT(void) {
         trc(F("RFM69 receiver ID:"));
         trc(valueRCV);
       }
-      if(radio.sendWithRetry(valueRCV, data, strlen(data)),10) {
+      if(radio.sendWithRetry(valueRCV, data, strlen(data),10)) {
         trc(F(" OK "));
         // Acknowledgement to the GTWRF topic
         char buff[sizeof(subjectGTWRFM69toMQTT)+4];
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ boolean RFM69toMQTT(void) {
         int valueRCV = RFM69data["receiverid"]| defaultRFM69ReceiverId; //default receiver id value
         trc(F("RFM69 receiver ID:"));
         trc(valueRCV);
-        if(radio.sendWithRetry(valueRCV, data, strlen(data)),10) {
+        if(radio.sendWithRetry(valueRCV, data, strlen(data),10)) {
           trc(F(" OK "));
           // Acknowledgement to the GTWRF topic
           pub(subjectGTWRFM69toMQTT, RFM69data);// we acknowledge the sending by publishing the value to an acknowledgement topic, for the moment even if it is a signal repetition we acknowledge also